August 29th, 2010
A July 2010 study supported by the Philadelphia Foundation highlighted the management difficulties for nonprofit organizations that do not have any savings in the mist of government cuts and reductions in charitable giving. Government cuts have significantly reduced money for nonprofit organizations in the past two years and the cuts are likely to continue for some time. All nonprofits that received funding cuts also trimmed services, programs and staff and sometimes key staff. However, the nonprofits that had savings were able to manage with less trauma. That study encourages donors to provide more funds for administration of nonprofits and not just programs so that they may keep key staff. The study also advocated for an approach that I have long promoted of accumulating savings by nonprofit organizations.
In 2008 I wrote about the importance of earning excess revenue and saving for nonprofit organizations in order to encourage innovation and manage reductions in donations or government funding. Excess revenue is the money that is received, but not spent and retained each year.
Earning excess revenue is most common in the affordable housing activities of nonprofit organizations. For example, nonprofit housing developers may earn a development fee for their efforts to create housing for low income persons. This fee must be used for a charitable purpose, but it may be retained instead of spent in the year it is received.
Nonprofit organizations that produce housing for low income persons routinely take what is earned from the development of the housing and apply the earnings to the charitable work of the organization. For example, New Communities in Newark, NJ supports a significant social service support and jobs operation for over 12,000 individuals with money earned from many low income housing developments and a neighborhood retail center. Other organizations like Esperanza in Philadelphia, PA have created a junior college with the accumulated savings from neighborhood revitalization real estate projects.
Nonprofit organizations may also earn income that is exempt from taxation in carrying out charitable activities in such activities as renting housing to low income persons, selling books, providing child or elderly care or charging fees for services. The fees that a nonprofit organization may charge for its services are limited however. The services provided for which a fee is received must be substantially related to the charitable purpose of the organization. In addition, the charitable activity cannot have an undue commercial hue and the fee must be reasonable. However, the money earned after paying all expenses is exempt income that can be retained from year to year for charitable purposes.
Unfortunately, the dominant approach in the nonprofit sector is based on cost reimbursement and cost allocation. This approach has two major limitations. First, reimbursement for cost limits the payments to nonprofit based on actual costs. Savings is not an actual cost. Second, the allocation of all cost means that all money is allocated to operating expenses. When all money is allocated to operating expenses then there is no money left at the end of the year. There is no money retained from the end of one year to the next.
For example, an organization may receive a government grant to provide emergency shelter services that only permits reimbursement for actual costs. Invoices to support actual cost and timesheets to show actual time worked of staff are required to demonstrate actual cost. At the end of the work, there is service, relief of the poor, but no money.
As a result, the drive to avoid paying for duplication of cost leaves the nonprofit organization without any savings to manage cash flow issues or loss of donations. In addition, the organization has no funds for innovation.
Instead, nonprofit organizations should attempt to accumulate savings by getting more income than expenses each year in order to address the up and downs of operations without violating the public trust. Organizations that retain excess revenue from year to year may build up significant capital that can permit investment in deeper and broader charitable services and work. It is the continued capital formation from retaining excess revenue that creates the resources for sustainability and innovation that many nonprofit organizations and the public need.
-Art Haywood
Churches that create jobs and housing for the community may add to the income and stability of a neighborhood and increase membership and giving. Churches invest were government and business do not because of a faith commitment to the oppressed with long term perseverance. Churches invest without a goal of profit. Churches bring compassion to the environment.
In addition, churches can bring love, community support and money to invest in a community. The money that a church may apply to a project may be to pay a staff person to perform community development work or to contribute to the cost of a recreation center or low income housing of senior and families or other purposes.
Church community development does require a connection between religious and nonreligious people and institutions to change a community. Religious organizations that do not reach out to the community will find great difficulty in an approach that seeks to impose the will of the church on a community. Community participation in community development is fundamental. Some community support will be required for extensive work. That community support will typically include local politicians and community leaders.
Churches can obtain political support for community development without endorsements and campaigning. Neighborhood improvement should be support without a quid pro quo exchange requirement with politicians or community leaders.
Two main roles exist for church community development (CD) work. One role is to influence development. Influencing development means that a church is supporting the work of another organization and not taking on the work directly. For example, a church may participate in a coalition to attract retail or housing development into an area. A church may write a support letter or call a source of financial support for a community development project. A church leader might serve on the board of a local community development organization. When a church decides to influence development it can usually do so without developing concentrated leadership.
On the other hand, if a church decides to undertake a community development project, concentrated leadership is essential. The activities of apartment creation, operating a school, building an area that is conducive for retail business is full time hard work. Implementing community development requires concentrated leadership and therefore some separation from worship focus of church.
A separate nonprofit organization is recommended to conduct community development work with church oversight on the board of directors of a nonprofit organization. The board of directors of the nonprofit may be appointed by the church, typically the board of trustees or deacons. The board of directors oversees the activities of the staff of the organization. The composition of the board of directors should include persons that are loyal to the church as well as person with some experience in the area of community development that the organization is undertaking. Persons familiar with finance are very valuable as well. Persons who understand how to obtain money from foundations, government or corporations are also very valuable to boards.
The church can remain connected to the newly formed nonprofit organization. Church and new nonprofit organization may share office location and office supplies. The leadership of the nonprofit corporation and the church may be shared. The nonprofit organization will be governed by a board of directors. That board of directors may have persons selected by the church.
The name of the nonprofit organization does not need to include “Community Development Corporation” although it may do so. The CDC does not create special funding or privileges that some other name would not.
Forming the nonprofit organization requires creating a corporation in your state. Creating the nonprofit requires a name, address, purpose and at least to sign the incorporation documents. While the assistance of an attorney is not required for incorporation, it is recommended because of special provisions that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) demands in the incorporation documents to grant tax exemption.
Incorporation limits the liability of related nonprofit organization. The risk or losses of the nonprofit organization can then be separated from the church and the individuals that are operating the organization. Churches and individuals should not guarantee financing connected with community development.
Once your organization is incorporated it may obtain a tax identification number from the IRS and then apply for federal tax exemption. Applications for state and local tax exemptions may be required as well. The process of obtaining a federal tax exemption can also be aided by an attorney or an accountant. The IRS grants tax exemptions to organizations that are operated exclusively for charitable purpose upon submission and review of an application. The tax exemption application can be found at the IRS website along with a helpful instruction booklet.
Most nonprofit organizations that are undertaking community development work will seek recognition from the IRS under section 501(c)(3). The number of these organizations has grown dramatically over the past 20 years. IRS concerns about the operation of exempt organizations have concentrated on the pay to the leaders of these organization, conflicts of interests, political involvement and support for terrorism. All of the IRS concerns can be easily avoided with prudent management.
Nonprofit owners of land or buildings where renovations are being designed by should have a written agreement between the nonprofit organization and the architect. A standard agreement between an owner and architect is produced by the American Institute of Architects (AIA). If you use the standard agreement between owner and architect form the AIA here are four changes to it that should be considered to strengthen your position:
Make the architect responsible for designing the renovations to comply with the building code requirements. Add to Section 3.4.2: “It is understood and agreed that the Project shall be designed to conform fully to the requirements of the building, fire, and other codes of federal, state and local authorities having jurisdiction over the Project, including but not limited to requirements of the local authority. If a building or other permit is denied because of non-conforming item the Architect shall redesign the Project to conform to such requirements at Architect’s sole cost and expense.”
Make the architect responsible for visiting the site and checking on the work at least once every two weeks. Add Section 3.6.2.1: “Although the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check with the quantity of the work, Architect shall carefully review the quality and quantity of the work on average every two weeks when construction is actively in progress and as needed for work to proceed and as the nature of the work requires as part of Architect’s basic contract services, shall issue written reports of such reviews and further shall conduct any additional reviews as an additional service hereunder at any other time requested by the Owner.”
Make sure that the nonprofit organization gets to review and approve payments to construction contractors. Add to Section 3.6.3.1: “Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, the Architect shall review and forward the Contractor’s Application for payment with the Architect’s recommendation, to Owner for Owner’s approval or disapproval, as the case may be.”
Don’t pay for mistakes of the architect. Add Section 4.3.5: “Notwithstanding anything to the contrary expressed elsewhere in Article 4, no architectural services made necessary, in whole or part, by any fault or omission of the Architect to perform its duties, responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement, shall be compensated as an Additional Service under this Agreement.”
Don’t pay an additional “Termination Expense” if you must terminate the architect. Delete Section 9.7 and replace with:
“In the event of termination under this Article 9, Architect consents to Owner’s selection of another architect of Owner’s choice to assist the Owner in completing the Project. Architect further agrees, based on an agreement for just compensation to the architect, to cooperate and provide information requested by Owner in connection with the completion of the Project, and consents to and authorizes the making of any reasonable changes to the design of the Project by owner and such other architect, as Owner may desire. No such changes in design shall be deemed to be approved by the Architects as a result of this provision.”
-Art Haywood